The
people of Israel had a chequered history with kings; and the stories of their
recorded history show their ambiguity towards the office. They weren’t supposed
to have kings, but they wanted them. They should have been able to make it
together as a community with the occasional so-called “judge” to rise up and
deliver them from their enemies, but for at least some them, this situation was
never enough. They wanted more certainty, well at least apparent certainty,
than that—they wanted a proper ruler, a Lord, an owner, a Baal, like the
peoples who lived around them who always seemed to have it so much better than
they.
Now
at this point, you are meant to respond immediately with, “But Yahweh is their
Lord!” Indeed Yahweh, the saving One was their Lord, the one who had brought
them out of slavery into a new land, a land flowing with milk and honey, at
least according the stories of their recorded history. But the past always
seems so far in the past, and it’s always so difficult to keep your mind in the
right frame for the present. The overwhelming possibilities of the future weigh
heavily. What if they were overrun, if a “judge” failed to rise up at the right
moment, or worse still was defeated? The story of Samson is a salutary tale.
The people wanted far more security than that. So they looked for alternate
Lords.
The
book of Judges tells the story. It lays out the pattern and relates the
familiar story in rhythmic and monotonous regularity. The people looked for
other “lords”, other gods; Yahweh’s anger was kindled and they came under the
power of their enemies; the people cried out in repentance; Yahweh raises up a
judge for them; the judge delivers them from their enemies and the land is in
peace for the lifetime of the judge; when the judge dies, the people look for
new “lords” and the cycle begins again.
What
a cycle of domestic violence! No wonder the people want an alternative. Surely,
a proper leader, a king is what is required, for Yahweh as their king is not enough
to keep them safe.
So,
we come to the story of Samuel, the last “judge” of Israel, the last
charismatic leader of the tribes who serves to unite them and bring peace, the
last non-hereditary wise counsellor and military leader of the people. And the people
do not want the same thing to happen that has happened before. This time, they
want a proper ruler. They want a king. And they are not going to let Samuel die
before a king is anointed.
On
behalf of Yahweh, Samuel warns the people that they do not know what they ask. Their
proper ruler will rule by confiscating resources, not by inspiring people to
live and work together. Their proper rule will keep peace by subjugation and
not by inspiration. Their proper ruler will rule.
But
the people want a king!
I
re-watched the movie Jesus Christ
Superstar over the Easter weekend; and I marvelled again at the wonderful
tension that Andrew Lloyd Webber creates when Jesus is presented to the people
as a possible king, and the crowd cries, “We have no king but Caesar.” This
moment captures the irony of the history of the chosen people of God very
dramatically—an alternative ruler is offered to them as their leader, but it is
not enough, a proper ruler is demanded. And lest we think that this is only part
of the Israelite story and not part of our own as the chosen people of God, we
should recall the times when we have looked for proper rulers and failed to recognise
that we have one already in Yahweh God.
The
proper ruler Yahweh journeys with the people in slavery and the wilderness. The
proper ruler Yahweh journeys with the people in the mundane and the everyday. The
proper ruler Yahweh seeks to inspire and be in relationship, not to subjugate
and subordinate. But somehow this never seems enough for us.
We
want someone who stands out, who looks good, who rules with a firm hand, who
seems powerful and makes us feel that we might be powerful too. We look for the
magic quick fixes, and fail to understand that transformation is a journey. We
think that there is always something better for us to be, and fail to honour
the people whom we have been created. We want someone else to make the hard
decisions, travel the difficult journey, fight our battles, and keep everything
calm and peaceful at home. We have no king but Caesar.
The
coronation of Saul is a time of rejoicing for the Israelites, but we have to
hear within it the strange, bitter-sweet sounds of lament—not the lament of the
people but the lament of Yahweh and of Yahweh’s prophet, Samuel, that the
people of God have once again failed to honour the God who created them, and
redeemed them from slavery and has journeyed with them ever since—a house
divided against itself cannot stand.
A
house divided against itself cannot stand; and the nature of the house is not
determined by the ruler, but by the people and the choices they make,
particularly not in the household of God where participation is not enforced
and compliance not ensured through subjugation. In Jesus, we are offered a
household of living and working together with all the ambiguity that is
involved in that: the working through of conflicts; the working together for
the welfare of all; the working towards the promised hope of transformation
that comes about as we open ourselves to God’s journey further and further.
This is the household of God—where unity is gift and goal, peace is not
silencing each other but working through the hard stuff together, and our
brothers and sisters are those who work beside us, not the ones who lord it
over us—not for our sakes or for theirs, but for the sake of our proper ruler,
Yahweh God, and the welfare of Yahweh’s good Creation.
So,
let us remind ourselves again of the nature of the household in which God
enfolds us as we affirm our faith…